Review




Structured Review

Backyard Brains spikerecorder application
Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains <t>SpikeRecorder</t> software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).
Spikerecorder Application, supplied by Backyard Brains, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spikerecorder application/product/Backyard Brains
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spikerecorder application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials"

Article Title: Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials

Journal: Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education

doi: 10.59390/YNPH4485

Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).
Figure Legend Snippet: Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).

Techniques Used: Software, Marker

Laboratory P300 Results. A. Real-time analysis of the P300 in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software, showing averaged responses to oddball (left) and standard (right) tones. B. All oddball responses were overlaid (black) and averaged (teal) for a single representative session (top). Average responses for standard and oddball tone are plotted together (bottom), where a navy bar indicates regions where the average oddball response is statistically different from the standard tone response. Peak latencies that fall within the significance window are shown with a purple dot. C. Regions of significance and peaks that fall within said region are shown for all 81 recording sessions.
Figure Legend Snippet: Laboratory P300 Results. A. Real-time analysis of the P300 in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software, showing averaged responses to oddball (left) and standard (right) tones. B. All oddball responses were overlaid (black) and averaged (teal) for a single representative session (top). Average responses for standard and oddball tone are plotted together (bottom), where a navy bar indicates regions where the average oddball response is statistically different from the standard tone response. Peak latencies that fall within the significance window are shown with a purple dot. C. Regions of significance and peaks that fall within said region are shown for all 81 recording sessions.

Techniques Used: Software



Similar Products

90
Backyard Brains spikerecorder application
Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains <t>SpikeRecorder</t> software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).
Spikerecorder Application, supplied by Backyard Brains, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spikerecorder application/product/Backyard Brains
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spikerecorder application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).

Journal: Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education

Article Title: Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials

doi: 10.59390/YNPH4485

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of Alpha Wave Experiment. A. Real-time analysis in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software showing alpha waves (10 Hz, arrow) occurring during the eyes closed condition. B. Representative trace of one event, marked by the “closed” event marker (top). The representative trace was filtered and colored to highlight analyzed regions (below). C. Differences in frequency power for eyes open (yellow) and eyes closed (orange) conditions (left). Plot showing the ratio of alpha power in eyes closed/eyes open conditions for all events, shown as dots (middle). Arrow identifies the event shown at left. Average change in alpha power per participant shown as bar. Histogram showing the change in alpha power for all recorded events (right).

Article Snippet: The SpikeRecorder application GitHub repository is at: https://github.com/BackyardBrains/ .

Techniques: Software, Marker

Laboratory P300 Results. A. Real-time analysis of the P300 in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software, showing averaged responses to oddball (left) and standard (right) tones. B. All oddball responses were overlaid (black) and averaged (teal) for a single representative session (top). Average responses for standard and oddball tone are plotted together (bottom), where a navy bar indicates regions where the average oddball response is statistically different from the standard tone response. Peak latencies that fall within the significance window are shown with a purple dot. C. Regions of significance and peaks that fall within said region are shown for all 81 recording sessions.

Journal: Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education

Article Title: Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials

doi: 10.59390/YNPH4485

Figure Lengend Snippet: Laboratory P300 Results. A. Real-time analysis of the P300 in Backyard Brains SpikeRecorder software, showing averaged responses to oddball (left) and standard (right) tones. B. All oddball responses were overlaid (black) and averaged (teal) for a single representative session (top). Average responses for standard and oddball tone are plotted together (bottom), where a navy bar indicates regions where the average oddball response is statistically different from the standard tone response. Peak latencies that fall within the significance window are shown with a purple dot. C. Regions of significance and peaks that fall within said region are shown for all 81 recording sessions.

Article Snippet: The SpikeRecorder application GitHub repository is at: https://github.com/BackyardBrains/ .

Techniques: Software